
Website of Rabbi Shai Gluskin
Home
Shimon Peres' Response to Bush Speech
From Yediot Ahronot, Israel Daily newspaper. The
following is an eyewitness account of Shimon Peres'
responses while watching George Bush's 6/24/02 speech
proposing his peace plan. It is written by Yediot reporter
Shimon Shiffer:
Shimon Peres' face became more and more weary and angry,
the longer Bush went on with his speech. "He is making a
fatal mistake" remarked Peres. "Making the creation of a
Palestinian state dependant upon a change in the Palestinian
leadership is a fatal mistake" he repeated again and again.
"Arafat has led the Palestinians for 35 years, kept their
head above the water in the international arena. No, no, you
can't just brush him aside with one speech." Peres did not
watch the speech to the very end. He got up, turned off the
TV and left the room, saying before he left: "The abyss into
which the region will plunge will be as deep as the
expectations from this speech were high. There will be a
bloodbath."
Yediot Ahronot Editorial of 6/25/02
A big smile must have spread over Ariel Sharon's face at
listening to the Middle East speech of his good friend
George W. Bush. After all the hesitations and delays, the
highly publicized power struggles between the State
Department and the Pentagon, the tense waiting and the
inaccurate advance leaks (which included the briefing by the
White House spokesperson, an hour before the speech itself)
- after all these, the leader of the Free World came out
with one single message: anything but Yasser Arafat. The man
with the beard must go - in a free democratic way, of
course. How many other people will be gone by then, ours and
theirs, the president did not say.
It is common to say that following September 11 the Bush
Administration is in the habit of dividing the world into
goodies and baddies. It is true, but not the whole truth:
even before that terrible day in New York, the president has
been consistently dividing the world into those who are like
America and those who are not. Those who are like America
have transparency and a free market, elections to change the
government and independent judiciaries. Those who are not
like America have nothing. Bush's message to the
Palestinians is simple: if you become like us, we will help
you improve your life; if you don't, we will just wait until
you do.
The fact that a free market and an independent judiciary
are impossible for a people under occupation does not appear
to disturb Bush, member of a nation which saw no foreign
invader on its soil for the past two centuries. Nor does the
fact that legitimate self-defense against terrorism drags
Israel into activities which perpetuate and aggravate that
occupation interest a person who can send the marines
anywhere he chooses and pull them out again at his
discretion. And he does not seem to lose sleep even over the
fact that while these contradictions bump against each
other, the blood of hundreds of civilians is shed over here
every month. As far as the White House is concerned, either
a new America will arise here, or we will just have to wait.
The White House is not concerned with many of us and how
many of them will not survive to see that day.
So, Arafat is an obstacle - to his people, to us and to
the region; a despicable fanatic. Still, peoples are not in
the habit of changing their leaders at an order from
Washington. Just 90 miles from the shores of Florida there
is a country ruled, for more than forty years, by a man
which the United States government despises and in whose
overthrow successive administrations invested enormous
efforts. The Americans impose a blockade on Cuba, starve its
people to punish them for daring to adopt such a regime, and
wait for Fidel Castro or his people to take the hint. They
are waiting for a long time already. And what is true in
Cuba is certainly true in the Middle East. America can wait
for the Israelis and Palestinians, and they can wait for
America while shedding each other's blood.
In the coming days, we will undoubtedly hear a lot from
Sharon's aides about how this great diplomatic coup was
achieved, due to Sharon's charm and Arafat's sins. We will
hear how wonderful it is that the American president was
convinced to sit on his hands a bit longer, to give some
more time for suicide bombings and military operations to
follow upon each other undisturbed. We will hear how we won
some more time, time in which we can continue to live in
fear, to become a bit more impoverished and bit more
desperate with every passing day. "Anything but Arafat". The
president said it. What a great victory. It was a speech of
encouragement to the rejectionists on both sides. No action
of any kind was announced. No declaration was made of
involvement - by the US alone, or together with its allies -
in any effort to stop the intolerable bloodletting in one of
the globe's most sensitive regions. There was nothing but
the narrow worldview of a person who is willing to help
everybody become an imitation American, and wants nothing to
do with anybody else. Nothing but a promise that, while the
roses continue to bloom in the White House garden, the red
spots seen on Israeli and Palestinian streets will be no
flowers.
|