
Website of Rabbi Shai Gluskin
Home
Haaretz
Op-Ed Piece, Wednesday, June 26, 2002.
Both sides are wrong
by Amira Hass
A radio interviewer asked IDF Spokesman Ron Kitrey on
Sunday about the three children killed in Jenin by Israeli
soldiers in a tank (who also killed a 60-year-old civilian).
The interviewer chose his words carefully. So carefully,
that he asked Kitrey about the "youths" who were killed.
These "youths" were 6-year-old Soujoud Turkey, Ahmed
Ghazawi, also 6 years old, and his 12-year-old brother
Jamil. The two brothers had been riding their bicycles in
their neighborhood. They, like many others, thought that the
curfew had been lifted for several hours. Soujoud Turkey had
gone out with her father to buy bread.
The interviewer stammered slightly as he posed his
question, perhaps because in these days of suicide bombings
it is not considered politically correct to discuss
Palestinian casualties. Turning them into "youths" was not a
slip of the tongue. It reflects a phenomenon. Even before
the suicide attacks became a daily routine, for Israeli
society the IDF's Palestinian civilian victims simply
evaporated, and they continue to evaporate. They are not
perceived as relevant in the political and military
contexts.
This is not about appealing to one's sense of morality
and compassion, nor is it forgetting the Israeli pain. It is
about the ability to analyze why the conflict has become
entangled to the point of a bloody cycle of violence beyond
control. To analyze - in order to be able to control it.
Israel's analytical ability has been impaired because its
collective political consciousness is unwilling to take into
account the cumulative Palestinian pain in this intifada and
during the Oslo years that preceded it.
Israeli political consciousness has rejected and
continues to reject any attempt or proposal to grasp the sum
total of the details, characteristics and consequences of
the continued Israeli rule over another people. When one
tries to talk of the "totality" known as the occupation, the
media - the social barometer - responds with resentment.
This "totality" is too abstract, transparent, academic.
Let's talk about "personal stories" instead.
But when one talks about personal stories, that is
exactly how they are perceived: as another tear-jerker about
an individual suffering Palestinian. Before this intifada,
such stories (deaths at roadblocks, Israeli quotas for
drinking water, a ban on building schools in Area C, a
significant expansion of settlements, movement restrictions)
were perceived as exceptions to "the peace process,"
although they harmed the Palestinian population every day.
Today, reports on "Palestinian suffering" are perceived
as national treason. Israelis conclude that the suicide
attacks are the result of a murderous tendency inherent to
the Palestinians, their religion, their mentality. In other
words, people turn to bio-religious explanations, not social
or historical ones. This is a grave mistake. If one wants to
put an end to the terror attacks in general, and to the
suicide attacks in particular, one must ask why the majority
of the Palestinian population supports them. Without their
support, the Palestinian organizations would not dare to
send suicide attackers and "invite" the expected escalating
Israeli response. The Palestinians support the attacks, even
the cruelest ones, because they are convinced that they,
their existence and their future as a nation are the real
targets of the Israeli regime - both when it applied
rule-by-deceit tactics during the Oslo period, and now, when
it uses tactics of military escalation and siege.
Israeli society did not pay heed to Palestinian warnings
during the Oslo period, that an imposed arrangement would
lead to disaster. Neither did Israeli political
consciousness listen at the beginning of the intifada when
the Palestinians pointed to the excessive use of Israeli
military force against the first demonstrations. Now, 22
months later, one can here and there find comments by
journalists and politicians who in hindsight admit that
under Ehud Barak and Shaul Mofaz, excessive use was already
made of lethal methods. If there was indeed a desire to
control the whirlpool of violence, that harsh military
response was a mistake. But this excessive use of force has
not been erased from the Palestinians' consciousness. And
why should they forget their children, who were killed just
because they threw stones at armored jeeps, tanks and
fortified outposts? Why should they forget the civilians
killed by IDF fire at roadblocks and in their homes, not
during gunfights?
The Palestinians are now driven by the same misguided
notion that directed Barak, Mofaz and the commanders on the
ground at the beginning of the intifada, and the entire
Israeli society that stood behind them: "More force and more
killing and suffering, as quickly as possible, will teach
the other side a lesson and foil their plans."
The suicide attacks in Israel indicate an impaired
analytical ability on the part of the majority of
Palestinian society. They fail to grasp that just as the
daily killings by IDF soldiers and unbearable living
conditions under the tightening siege policy only strengthen
them, the Israeli response to the death sown in their midst
by the Palestinians is much the same. Both sides are
convinced that only more deadly and devastating force will
restrain the opposing force. Both sides are wrong.
|